Apostolic Authority, Baptism, and the Indians
Roger Williams and eleven friends formed the first Baptist Church in
America in Providence, Rhode Island. Ezekiel Holliman was one
of them. He baptized Williams by immersion in March of 1639. He
had followed Williams from the Salem, Massachusetts church where
Williams had briefly taught several years before. Williams then
proceeded to baptize Holliman and ten friends. Shortly after this,
however, he came to a most remarkable conclusion. Let's hear an
eyewitness account of what happened:
I (Richard Scott) walked with him in the Baptists' way about
three or four months, in which time he brake from the society,
and declared at large the ground and reasons of it; that their
baptism could not be right because it was not administered by
an apostle. After that he set upon a way of seeking (with two
or three other men that had dissented with him) by way of preaching
and praying; and there he continued a year or two, till two of
the three had left him.
Roger
Williams' actions declared what his later words would make abundantly
clear: all Christian baptisms were and are invalid, unless apostles,
like those of the Jerusalem Church, administered them. Roger Williams
understood this in his radical statement regarding the conversion
of the Indians of New England:
How readily I could have brought the whole
Country to have observed one day in seven; ... to have received
a Baptism ... to have come to a stated Church meeting,
maintained priests and forms of prayer, and a whole form of Antichristian
worship in life and death ... Why have I not brought them
to such a conversion as I speak of? I answer, woe be to me, if I
call light darkness, and darkness light ... woe be to me if I
call that conversion unto God, which is indeed subversion of the
souls of millions in Christendom, from one false worship
to another, and the profanation of the holy name of God.
What
then would be the hallmarks of the apostolic authority
Roger Williams waited for? Paul put it this way, "... through
whom we have received grace and apostleship to bring about the
obedience of faith among all the Gentiles, for His name's sake."
Apostles communicate saving faith which enables a man to obey
the Son of God. Such preaching reveals the worth of the Savior
to the heart of those who are willing to do the will of God.
It comes from those who have no deceit or hidden sin,
and even pierces
the heart of the most religious people who still have a heart
for God.
Not many in Roger Williams' day, or since, have had the
courage to face what history's testimony plainly tells,
that Christianity is totally condemned by the words of the
Scriptures. The Christian Church has lost its authority
because of the blood she has shed, the corruptions she has
allowed in her own midst, and the fornication she has commited
with the kings of this earth in exchange for worldly favor
and power. No denomination that accepts the historic Christian
Church as legitimate can be free of the guilt of the blood
she has shed. Nor can they possibly escape the corruptions
that have ensnared her since she began in compromise with
the Roman Empire.
This is the unambiguous essence of Roger Williams' thinking
about Christianity, and it is valid.
Sydney Ahlstrom, A Religious History of the American People,
volume 1, page 222.
The trust the Indians accorded him because of his friendship,
fair dealing, and the effort he put in to learn their language,
made him uniquely qualified to do this.
"Christenings Make Not Christians," The Complete Writings of Roger
Williams, volume 7, pages 36-37.
Rom. 1:5; Paul reiterates this thought three more times in Romans:
10:16; 15:18; and 16:26.
From this compromise have sprung the three main divisions of Christianity:
Roman, Eastern, and the Protestant branch, with its multitude
of denominations.
|