Only the Dead Go Down to Silence
A cult, someone once
wisely said, is any group you dont like. The Encyclopedia
Britannica defines it more objectively. It actually has to
do with the way people in cults worship their God.
Cultic worship is so universal in religion that some
historians of religion define religion as cult. Cultic worship
is social, and this means more than a group worshipping the same
deity in the same place at the same time. Cult is structured with
a division of sacred personnel (priests) who lead and perform
the cultic ceremonies for the people, who are in a more distant
relation with the deity. The sacred personnel are designated by
the choice and acceptance both of the deity and of the worshipping
group. The words and actions of the cultic performance are divided
into roles assigned to the leaders and to the worshippers. It
is the tendency of cultic worship to replace spontaneity, which
it once had, with set and even rigid forms of words and acts.
These are preserved by tradition, and they generally have a sacredness
that is based on the belief that the directions for cultic worship
came ultimately from the deity.
So there are several distinguishing
features of a cult, namely
- The "cult" worships
their God in the same place at the same time. (This is a nearly
universal feature of religion.)
- The "cult"
has set-apart priests or ministers who stand in
a closer relationship to God than the people. (This should not
be true of the royal priesthood Peter spoke of.)
- These priests or ministers
lead the worship of God, which was once spontaneous, into set
or even rigid form of words and acts.
- The "cult" believes
their form of worship to be from God
even if it is far
different than the former, open, lively, participatory worship
their "group" began with.
So the typical clergy
and laity distinction of churches today (and not just
today, but for many centuries now) makes both Christian and Catholic
worship with their paid and trained sacred personnel
truly cultic. It all began years ago, when something
started to go on in the churches that had never happened before
the people became silent and only the voices of their leaders
were heard. Before this, everyone came with something to share,
as Paul instructed the Corinthians.
In his first letter he told them the outcome of God being among
them would be that all would prophesy. All, not
just the clergy,
would come with a psalm, a teaching, a revelation,
and a tongue (if there were an interpretation). Both
the men and the women could speak, as long as the women wore their
head coverings when they prayed or prophesied.
It was a true priesthood of all the believers, where all could
and were expected to speak the very words of God.
Yet for many reasons on the
part of both the people and their leaders, something started to
happen in the young church even before the first century ended.
The church divided into clergy and laity, and
the laity were silenced. They were conquered. The
apostle John, writing at the end of the apostolic age, called
these conquerors the Nicolaitans:
Yet this you do have, that you hate the deeds of the Nicolaitans,
which I also hate. (Revelations 2:6)
The word Nicolaitan comes from two Greek words, nikos,
meaning conquest, triumph victory, and laos, people.
The Nicolaitans were victorious over the people. The
change that this produced in the Church was profound. The Christian
historians also record this change, noting that many even considered
it a curse:
Between the years AD
100 and AD 500, the Christian Church changed almost beyond recognition.
... [At first] The organization of the church was still fluid
there
were no creeds to be recited, no set forms of worship
[By AD 500] The worship of the church was entirely liturgical
with fixed, set forms of prayer
Most of these changes
came gradually over four hundred years. On the whole they were
for the good and reflected healthy growth on the part of the
church. But not all the changes were necessarily for the better.
Many today would consider the alliance with the state and the
transformation of Christianity into an official religion to
be at best a mixed blessing, if not actually a curse. Many would
be less than enthusiastic about the pattern of ministry that
emerged and about the suppression of the free forms of worship.
To this day the people remain
silent in the churches across America, indeed, across all of Christendom.
True, they sing when they are supposed to, respond when they are
supposed to, give money when they are supposed to, stand up, sit
down, file in and file out when they are supposed to. They are
led in all these things by their leaders, whom they expect to
be closer to God than themselves because they have been educated
in the skills of oratory and doctrine. But they are not told that
they are participating in classic cultic worship. Nor are
they told that this is not what Messiah Yahshua
died for.
The people do not know, nor does each generation of conquerors
know, that their worship and their faith are built on another
foundation than the one Paul and the other apostles laid.
It is an ancient practice, but it does not go back to the beginning.
1 Corinthians 14:24-33 is the beginning, where all come prepared
and have the freedom to speak. They do not know, and their conquerors
do not teach them, that their silence in the churches is the ringing
affirmation that the Holy Spirit does not dwell there.
They are not told that only the dead go down to silence before
their God. All they know is that this is the way
it has always been, so this must be the way it should be.
When the least of the brothers could no longer speak in the gathering
and be heard, the Holy Spirit had no more voice among the people,
and He departed.
He will not dwell in silence,
nor will He continue to be head over any church where the people
lose their outspokenness:
...but Christ was faithful as a Son over His house whose
house we are, if we hold fast our confidence and the boast of
our hope firm until the end. (Hebrews 3:6)
Confidence
is a very special word here. It is number 3954 in Strongs
Greek Concordance of the Bible, and means freedom of speaking,
unreservedness in speech, openly, frankly, free and fearless confidence,
cheerful courage, boldness, assurance. This means if Gods
people lose their outspokenness in the gatherings, as Paul spoke
of in 1 Corinthians 14:24-26, then the Messiah will no longer
be head over that house.
Encyclopedia Britannica,
Macropaedia, Vol. 15, page 996 (1979)
1 Peter 2:9, which is itself the fulfillment of what old
Israel never attained to in Exodus 19:5,6.
There was no such thing as a "clergy" in Pauls
day. He had no such concept. The clergy came along because they
didnt obey Pauls instructions in 1 Corinthians 14:24-26.
The term itself came later when there was only a select group
that spoke in church.
Nicolaus, from which Nicolaitan comes, is #3532 in Strongs
Greek Concordance of the New Testament. It comes from #3534, nikos,
and #2992, laos.
Tony Lane, The Lion Book of Christian Thought (Lion Publishing
Company, Batavia, Illinois, 1984), page 8.
1 Corinthians 3:10-17 and 2 Corinthians 11:2-4
Earle E. Cairns writes in Christianity Through the Centuries
(Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, Michigan), p. 83, that
as early as the middle of the second century [around AD 150],
worship consisted of several readings from epistles and the prophets,
a homily [sermon] by the "president", responsorial prayer
by the people [they said "Amen" when they were supposed
to], the Lords supper, and collection of the offering, which
was followed by dismissal of the people to their homes. And so
it is to this day
The people were silenced, conquered, and
so it is to this day